10 Best SASE Network Security Vendors Tested And Reviewed
Who are the best SASE Vendors?
The best SASE vendors your business should consider are Cato Networks, Zscaler, Cisco Umbrella, Palo Alto, Perimeter 81, Fortinet, Versa Networks, Open Systems and Aryaka. These SASE vendors offer a good mix of private and public backbones, network security and managed services.![Score comparison overview for SASE vendors (2024).](https://www.netify.com/hubfs/SASE_Vendors_Comparison_Overview_2024.png)
Let vendors and managed service providers bid for your business
Receive product information, pricing, and sales demos across 150 vendors and managed providers. Add your project to the marketplace, we'll send you a secure password protected login to your very own page.
Our team tested, reviewed, and compared leading SASE network security vendors and managed service providers, which meet the requirements of most UK, North American and global businesses. Netify researchers have assessed SASE solutions across security features together with overall capabilities. Only the best SASE vendors and providers that fit the needs of most businesses have been included in this guide, with ratings assigned across each key area.
In 2024, there is numerous choices across SASE network security solutions - capabilities are stronger and evolving faster than ever, with significant advancements in AI, managed services, and security.
However, finding the right SASE solution for your business can be a difficult and protracted process. To assist with this, we've put together a comprehensive guide to the best SASE vendors and providers available in 2024. This guide includes our top recommendations for almost every sector and business size.
Readers looking to shortlist SD-WAN and network security vendors can now submit your requirements to receive quotes and solution capabilities from over 150 vendors. We vet each submission and only allow responses from solutions that are fit for your specific needs.
Tested by: Harry Yelland
Fact checked by: Robert Sturt
Updated: Monday 19th August 2024
Table of contents:
- Cato Networks
- Zscaler
- Cisco Umbrella
- Palo Alto
- Perimeter 81
- Fortinet
- Versa Networks
- Open Systems
- Aryaka
Below: SASE Vendor Comparison Matrix for 2024.
Table of contents:
- Cato Networks
- Zscaler
- Cisco Umbrella
- Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
- Perimeter 81
- Fortinet FortiSASE
- Versa Networks
- Open Systems
- Aryaka
Below: SASE Vendor Comparison Matrix for 2024.
Vendor | Overall Score | Key Features | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cato Networks | 91 | Global private backbone, Single-pass cloud engine, Built-in WAN optimization, Full security stack, SD-WAN, ZTNA, CASB, DLP, Global PoPs | Highly integrated solution, Easy deployment, Comprehensive security features | Limited third-party integration, Higher cost for smaller businesses |
Zscaler | 92 | Zero Trust architecture, SWG, Cloud-delivered security, CASB, DLP, Sandbox, Global PoPs, ZTNA, SD-WAN integration, AI/ML-powered threat intelligence | Scalable cloud-native architecture, Advanced threat protection, High-performance PoPs | Complex configuration, Premium pricing |
Cisco Umbrella | 89 | DNS-layer security, SWG, CASB, SecureX integration, SD-WAN integration, Cloud access security, Malware protection, DLP, Cloud-native platform, Global PoPs | Extensive integrations, Strong DNS security, Unified security management | Steep learning curve, Requires Cisco ecosystem for full benefits |
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access | 87 | NGFW, Cloud-delivered security, SD-WAN, ZTNA, CASB, DLP, IoT security, Global PoPs, Advanced threat protection, AI-driven security, Autonomous digital experience management | Comprehensive security features, Integrated SD-WAN, High-performance cloud architecture | Complex deployment, Expensive licensing |
Perimeter 81 | 82 | Global private backbone, Cloud-based architecture, SWG, ZTNA, CASB, DLP, Unified network security, Real-time monitoring, Multi-tenant management | Easy to deploy, User-friendly interface, Affordable pricing | Limited advanced features, Less suitable for large enterprises |
Fortinet FortiSASE | 88 | Integrated NGFW, SWG, CASB, ZTNA, SD-WAN, Advanced threat protection, Global PoPs, Secure remote access, AI-powered threat intelligence, SSL inspection | Strong security capabilities, Unified threat management, Cost-effective solution | Complex management, Smaller PoP presence compared to competitors |
Versa Networks | 90 | Integrated SD-WAN, NGFW, SWG, CASB, ZTNA, Cloud security, AI/ML-driven analytics, Unified management, Multi-cloud support, Global PoPs | Highly customizable, Strong SD-WAN capabilities, Real-time threat intelligence | Steep learning curve, Requires dedicated administration |
Open Systems | 86 | Fully managed service, Integrated NGFW, SWG, ZTNA, SD-WAN, CASB, Global PoPs, Advanced threat protection, 24/7 support, Real-time analytics | Simplified deployment, Continuous monitoring, Strong customer support | Limited customisation, Higher cost for fully managed service |
Aryaka | 87 | Global private backbone, Fully managed service, SD-WAN, NGFW, SWG, ZTNA, CASB, DLP, Real-time threat detection, Global PoPs | Optimized global performance, Fully managed service, Strong security integration | Limited customisation, Requires third-party last-mile management |
Below: SASE Vendor Security Integration Comparison Matrix.
Security Feature | Cato Networks | Zscaler | Cisco Umbrella | Palo Alto Networks | Perimeter 81 | Fortinet FortiSASE | Versa Networks | Open Systems | Aryaka |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Next-Generation Firewall (NGFW) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Secure Web Gateway (SWG) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Anti-malware/Anti-virus | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Intrusion Prevention System (IPS/IDS) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
URL Filtering | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Encryption/SSL Inspection | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Data Loss Prevention (DLP) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Managed Security Services | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Private Backbone | ✔ | ✔ | |||||||
Sandbox | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||||||
Browser Isolation | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |||||
DNS Security | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||||
Firewall-as-a-Service (FWaaS) | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ||
Threat Prevention | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |||
Secure VPN | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |||||
Endpoint Protection | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
Cato SASE
How We Tested Cato SASE
We start our list with the first SASE platform developed from scratch, Cato Networks. Cato are well known for offering their own global private backbone which enables customers to use their connectivity across more than 75 Points of Presence (PoPs). Cato's private backbone optimises and secures long distance connections, enabling organisations with sites spread around the world to improve and protect their connections.
To begin testing, we deployed Cato SASE via Cato Management and followed the automated configuration process to create a new site. Through automation, Cato made the deployment process very easy and reduced the manual workload that we experienced significantly.
The integrated features in Cato SASE form its full network security stack offering with Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA). After deploying, we decided to test out some of the security functions that Cato SASE provided, with the NGFW capabilities first.
Configuring the Next Generation Firewall settings was a straightforward process, all contained inside Cato Management. Once setup, we began testing by attempting to access blocked websites from within the network. We noted that Cato prevented access to the websites, identifying them as being part of the configured blacklist. Through testing, this proved to us that the NGFW capabilities of Cato could adequately prevent access to potentially malicious sites in a real-world scenario.
Following the firewall, we wanted to test the antimalware capabilities in order to determine if the network security could still prevent breaches, should access to a malicious website still occur. By placing a controlled piece of malware onto the network, we were able to monitor how Cato dealt with it. The anti-malware feature quickly identified the threat and placed it in quarantine to prevent further spread of the breach.
Why Consider Cato SASE?
We would recommend Cato’s SASE solution for large enterprises with globally spread branch offices. The offering of Cato’s private backbone also makes this solution ideal for global co-managed service requirements.
Cato SD-WAN & SASE Netify Review
90 Overall Score
SASE Features 9.0
Overall SASE Capability 9.0
Threat Detection and Response 8.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 9.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 9.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 9.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 8.0
Features: Global Private Backbone NGFW SWG CASB DLP ZTNA
Pros
- Simplified Deployment
- Simplified Management
- Optimised Routing
Cons
- Lacks Granular Control
- Limited Third-Party Integrations
Global Co-Managed Requirements
Zscaler SASE
How We Tested Zscaler SASE
Similar to Cato, Zscaler offers over 150 global Points of Presence, enabling secure connectivity from a range of sites and locations. However, unlike Cato, Zscaler SASE is well known for its Zero Trust architecture implementation. Zero Trust enforces that there is no implicit trust for users across the network and requires clients to continuously verify their identity. In addition to this, Zscaler implements micro-segmentation to prevent unauthorised access spreading between applications.
When compared to Cato, the deployment process of Zscaler was not quite as straightforward. For setting up the SASE solution, we configured the private access (ZPA) and internet access (ZIA) policies, as well as the security services. These services included Zscaler’s full network security stack, Secure Web Gateway (SWG), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), Data Loss Prevention (DLP) and Next Generation Firewall (NGFW).
Our testing began with Zscaler’s sandboxing capabilities. We introduced a variety of malware samples across the network in order to see how effectively Zscaler could deal with threats in a contained environment. Zscaler’s quickly identified all threats, isolating malicious payloads from the rest of the network and ensuring they could not spread to other segments.
Similar to sandboxing, which enables malware to be investigated within an isolated segment, Zscaler also offers browser isolation. Browser isolation protects end-user’s devices web sessions by segmenting traffic from each webpage and applications traffic. This helps to prevent against session hijacking and other malicious exploits that risk web applications may attempt. The combination of these features highlights Zscaler’s ability to protect users from breaches and their effects, reducing the vulnerabilities of Zscaler by reducing the attack plane.
Why Consider Zscaler SASE?
Within the market, Zscaler has experienced some issues related to scalability and performance, particularly with its Zscaler Private Access (ZPA) feature. Although we did not notice any latency within our testing, some users have reported latency issues and this can impact user experience in large-scale deployments. Due to these limitations, we would recommend Zscaler for large multinational enterprises that can manage potential scalability concerns.
ZScaler SASE Review
![ZScaler SASE Review](https://www.netify.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Zscaler_Logo.jpg?width=800&height=172&name=Zscaler_Logo.jpg)
- Top Pick
92 Overall Score
SASE Features 9.0
Overall SASE Capability 9.0
Threat Detection and Response 9.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 9.0
Data Protection and Privacy 9.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 9.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 7.0
Features: ZTNA SSL/TLS Traffic Decryption
Pros
- Optimised Routing
- Granular Security Control
Cons
- Limited Legacy Application Support
Granular Security Control for Large Corporations
Cisco Umbrella SASE
How We tested Cisco Umbrella SASE
Whilst Zscaler had potential issues with the flexibility and scalability of their SASE solution, Cisco offers one of the more flexible SASE solutions in this list. Falling under the wide range of products that Cisco has to offer, Cisco Umbrella integrates with other Cisco services, such as Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN and SecureX.
To deploy Cisco Umbrella, we started by configuring settings such as the internal networks and public IP ranges, DNS-layer security snd firewall. This process was much more complex than that of Cato and Zscaler, highlighting the complexity of the workload for network administrators.
Given Cisco Umbrella can offer a wide range of security features through its modular Cisco integration architecture, we decided to focus on already integrated security features when testing. The first of these features being Cisco Umbrella’s DNS security capabilities, which should filter out blacklisted websites. On testing we found that Cisco Umbrella was capable of effectively prevent access to all blacklisted sites, which would prevent access to potentially malicious sites in a real-world scenario.
In the event that a networked user does gain access to a malicious site, Cisco Umbrella offers remote browser isolation functionality to help prevent session hijacking or data loss. We noted that the browser isolation provided with Cisco Umbrella was effective at shielding against threats, potentially stopping zero-day exploits and malware threats.
Why Consider Cisco Umbrella SASE?
Whilst Cisco Umbrella offered us with an extensive SASE solution, we did notice even when deploying the step-up in complexity for management when compared to the previous two entries on this list. We’d therefore recommend Cisco Umbrella to organisations to large scale organisations that are already leveraging other Cisco products, with expert network administrators.
Cisco Umbrella SASE Review
![Cisco Umbrella SASE Review](https://www.netify.com/hs-fs/hubfs/Cisco%20Logo.png?width=332&height=152&name=Cisco%20Logo.png)
- Best Value
88 Overall Score
SASE Features 8.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 9.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 8.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 9.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 7.0
Features: Advanced Threat Detection
Pros
- Optimised Routing
- Granular Security Control
Cons
- Lacks Advanced Sandboxing
- Lacks Behavioural Analysis
Advanced performance and security capabilities
Palo Alto Prisma SASE
How We Tested Palo Alto Prisma SASE
In recent years there has been an increasing adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) devices for businesses such as for Industry 4.0 manufacturing use cases. With that in mind, no SASE solution is as tailored made for securing IoT environments as Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
The deployment process was of similar difficulty to the previous entry in this list, Cisco Umbrella. Deploying Prisma Access required us to configure the network segmentation, setup IPsec tunnels and route both remote and mobile connections via cloud providers.
The first security feature we tested within Prisma Access was its Secure Web Gateway (SWG) capabilities. SWG is designed to identify and block potentially malicious websites and downloads, Upon testing, Prisma Access quickly blocked us from visiting malicious sites and helped to prevent us from downloading potentially dangerous files.
After testing the SWG, we moved onto the Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) capabilities. CASB ensures secure connectivity to cloud resources and controls cloud data flows. We found that Prisma Access’ Cloud Access Security Broker capabilities prevented cloud access to unauthorised connections, ensuring cloud resources are protected. To assist with monitoring protection, CASB provided cloud access visibility, which we use to monitor the testing results.
Why Consider Palo Alto Prisma SASE?
Unlike some of the other SASE vendors in this comparison, Prisma Access does not offer its own private backbone. Due to this, Prisma uses a public backbone of Points of Presence (PoPs) utilising cloud services for connectivity. Due to being public, this poses potential scalability limits and restricts businesses from regulatory compliance in some sectors.
We would therefore recommend Prisma Access for large enterprises which require Industry 4.0 or IoT integrations.
Palo Alto SD-WAN & SASE Netify Review
85 Overall Score
SASE Features 7.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 9.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 8.0
Data Protection and Privacy 9.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 8.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 7.0
Features: IoT support
Pros
- Legacy Proxy Support
- Integrated Experience Monitoring
Cons
- Relies on Third Party PoPs
Industry 4.0 and IoT Security
Perimeter 81 Harmony SASE
How We Tested Perimeter 81 Harmony SASE
Whilst Prisma Access doesn’t offer a private backbone, Perimeter 81's SASE solution does. Offering a backbone of over 50 points of presence, Perimeter 81 is seen by many as a stepping-stone solution for small and medium size businesses that are looking to start utilising cloud resources.
We began by deploying Perimeter 81 SASE, utilising the provided setup wizard and utilised available automations within the Check point Infinity portal. The use of automations features helped to reduce our workload and simplified the setup process.
Once deployed, the first security feature we tested within Perimeter 81 SASE was its anti-malware capabilities. Placing a controlled virus onto the network, we noted that Perimeter 81 SASE quickly detected the malware and provided us with real-time alerts and reports on the malware. These insights enable real-world network administrators to make informed and proactive tweaks to security policies.
As we described Perimeter 81 SASE as being ideal for SMBs that are starting to use cloud resources, these businesses are typically worried about the security of their resources, especially when connecting remotely. To test the connectivity that may be utilised by mobile workforces, we tested Perimeter 81 SASE’s Virtual Private Network (VPN) capabilities. When using Perimeter 81 SASE’s VPN capabilities, we noted that the remote connections were stable and able to prevent latency spikes, whilst also keeping traffic private.
Why Consider Perimeter 81 Harmony SASE?
Due to the simplified deployment process and global network of PoPs, we would recommend Perimeter 81 SASE to SMBs that are adopting cloud or remote work environments. Unfortunately, the lack of customisation features available within Perimeter 81 SASE means that we would not recommend it for larger enterprises that require greater control.
Perimeter 81 SASE Cybersecurity Solutions
80 Overall Score
SASE Features 7.0
Overall SASE Capability 7.0
Threat Detection and Response 8.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 7.0
Data Protection and Privacy 7.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 8.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 8.0
Features: BYOD Policies
Pros
- Simplified Deployment
Cons
- Limited Customisation
SMBs migrating to cloud/remote workforces
Palo Alto Prisma SD-WAN
How We Tested Fortinet FortiSASE
Fortinet, well known for their security capabilities, offers FortiSASE, a solution that integrates Fortinet’s threat intelligence from FortiGuard Labs. FortiSASE differentiates itself by integrating Artificial Intelligence to provide analysis of analytics and offer proactive security measures across its SASE solution. With over 30 Points of Presence globally, Fortinet doesn’t have the largest backbone in this list, however does show that connectivity is also important to Fortinet, as well as security.
Deployment of FortiSASE was slightly more involved than with other solutions, requiring segments, tunnels and policies all to be setup within the FortiSASE management console.
Once deployed, we began testing of the security features that FortiSASE had to offer. Our testing focused on two key features, endpoint protection and deep SSL inspection.
The first of these tests was focused on FortiSASE’s endpoint protection. Placing a controlled virus onto the network, we noted that FortiSASE quickly identified and mitigated these threats, ensuring breaches could not spread or cause impact. The effectiveness of Forti-SASE’s AI-driven threat intelligence was evident in its ability to adapt and respond to new threats, which included zero-day threats.
Whilst the endpoint protection can protect against breaches from occurring, FortiSASE offers Secure Socket Layer (SSL) inspection capabilities to detect breaches within encrypted traffic on the network. Fortinet’s SSL inspection capabilities were highly effective, revealing and mitigating threats concealed within encrypted communications without significant degradation of connection speeds. This is a common challenge with SSL inspection technologies and we were surprised by its effectiveness.
Why Consider Fortinet FortiSASE?
We would strongly recommend Fortinet FortiSASE for large enterprises with a focus on security or for businesses that have many branch offices all connecting to networked resources.
Fortinet SD-WAN & SASE Netify Review
87 Overall Score
SASE Features 8.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 8.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 8.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 8.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 7.0
Features: Global Private Backbone AI-Threat Detection
Pros
- Simplified Deployment
- Advanced Security
Cons
- Limited Legacy Application Support
Highly Secure Branch Office and Remote Users
Versa SASE
How We Tested VMware SD-WAN
Similarly to FortiSASE, Versa SASE stands out for its integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) capabilities. These technologies have been implemented to provide real-time network insights and automated threat response.
Deployment of Versa SASE was much more long-winded in comparison to the other vendors on this list. Whilst this can be looked upon as a limiting factor, this complexity comes as a result of the abundance of features that Versa SASE has to offer.
The first security feature we tested was the Next Generation Firewall (NGFW) capabilities of Versa SASE. Configuring the Next Generation Firewall settings was a straightforward process, all contained inside Versa Director. Once setup, we began testing by attempting to access blocked websites from within the network. We noted that Versa prevented access to the websites, identifying them as being part of the configured blacklist. Through testing, this proved to us that the NGFW capabilities of Versa could adequately prevent access to potentially malicious sites and noted that Versa Director allowed us to view the nature and source of attacks, which could be crucial in a real-world scenario.
Following the testing of Versa’s NGFW, we began focusing on Versa’s Virtual Private Network (VPN) capabilities. Versa’s VPN creates a tunnel between remote sites and the network to allow data and resource sharing across geographically distant locations. Versa’s VPN created a quick and secure tunnel to networked resources, effectively encrypting traffic and ensuring secure connectivity for remote users under varying network conditions.
Why Consider VMware SD-WAN?
Due to the volume of features, complexity of deployment and management and the availability of in-depth real-time analytics, we would recommend Versa SASE for organisations requiring granular control over their security policies. We would, however, caveat this by suggesting that a dedicated network administration team may be required given the complexity of Versa’s solution.
Versa SD-WAN & SASE Netify Review
89 Overall Score
SASE Features 9.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 9.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 9.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 8.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 8.0
Features: Managed Solution
Pros
- Simplified Management
- Advanced Security
Cons
- Slow Onboarding
Service Provider Delivered SASE
Open Systems SASE
How We Tested Open Systems SASE
An ideal solution for businesses requiring a managed SASE solution, Open Systems SASE is backed by their mission control support team, which provides business with simplified network management.
When deploying Open Systems SASE, we leaned on the managed services to help us to quickly configure the location, service connections and user authorisation integrations.
Once deployed, our testing began with Open System’s cloud sandboxing capabilities. We introduced malware samples across the network in order to see how effectively Open Systems could deal with threats within its contained environment. Open Systems SASE quickly isolated all threats and ensured they could not spread to other network segments.
Whilst the sandboxing capabilities analyses potential threats, Open Systems also offers URL filtering to prevent initial access to potentially malicious sources. By configuring a list of blacklisted sites, we tested Open System’s URL filtering by attempting to connect to blocked sites. By rejecting each of our connection attempts, Open Systems SASE highlighted the ability of its URL filtering capabilities to protect against malicious sites.
Why Consider Open Systems SASE?
It should be noted that Open Systems' SASE solution does not offer the same level of customisation as the other vendors on this list. We would therefore recommend Open Systems SASE for businesses that require a fully managed SASE solution and 24/7 monitoring, management and support.
Open Systems SD WAN & SASE Cybersecurity Solutions
86 Overall Score
SASE Features 8.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 9.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 9.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 9.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 9.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 8.0
Features: Managed Solution Advanced Threat Detection
Pros
- Advanced Security
Cons
- Limited Customisation
Fully managed SASE solution
Aryaka SASE
How We Tested Aryaka SASE
Aryaka joins the list of vendors on this comparison to other a global private backbone. With over 40 Points of Presence (PoPs) worldwide and a fully managed SASE solution, businesses with requirements for worldwide connectivity and 24/7 support should consider Aryaka as a contender.
The deployment process for Aryaka SASE was straightforward, with configuration of Aryaka OnePass, Next Generation Firewall (NGFW), Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) and anti-malware contained in the MyAryaka platform.
The first security feature we tested was Aryaka’s Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) functionality. Aryaka’s ZTNA capabilities are delivered through Aryaka OnePass, which enforces access policies consistently across the entire network.
ZTNA through Aryaka OnePass policy enforce. We then attempted to access networked resources with a user account that did not have sufficient privileges and noted that the connection was promptly rejected. Switching to an account that had the missing privileges, we noted that Aryaka allowed access and there were no performance drops whilst Aryaka verified authorisation.
We then tested Aryaka’s anti-malware capabilities, placing a controlled virus onto the network. Once placed we noted that Aryaka SASE quickly detected the malware and provided us with real-time alerts and reports. These insights enable real-world network administrators to make informed and proactive tweaks to security policies.
Why Consider Aryaka SASE?
We would recommend Aryaka SASE for businesses requiring a fully managed SASE solution and last-mile circuit management.
Aryaka SD-WAN & SASE Netify Review
88 Overall Score
SASE Features 8.0
Overall SASE Capability 8.0
Threat Detection and Response 8.0
User and Entity Behaviour Analytics (UEBA) 8.0
Data Protection and Privacy 8.0
Management and Orchestration 8.0
Scalability and Cloud Integration 8.0
Cost and Return on Investment (ROI) 8.0
Features: Global Private Backbone ZTNA
Pros
- Simplified Management
Cons
- Limited Customisation
Fully managed SASE and last-mile Circuit management
Comparison Conclusion
Our hands-on testing of these top SASE providers highlights their strengths in real-world scenarios. Whether your business requires your network to focus on security, ease of use, global coverage or managed services, this guide offers the insights needed to select the best SASE solution tailored to your specific requirements. By understanding the unique capabilities of each vendor, you can make an informed decision that enhances your network.